An Immunologic Compatibility Testing Was Not Useful for Donor Selection in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective procedure against Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), with promising but still suboptimal performance in other diseases, such as ulcerative colitis (UC). The recipient's mucosal immune response against the donor's microbiota could be relevant factor in the effectiveness of FMT. Our aim was to design and validate an individualized immune-based test to optimize the fecal donor selection for FMT. First, we performed an in vitro validation of the test by co-culturing lymphocytes obtained from the small intestine mucosa of organ donor cadavers (n=7) and microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) obtained from the feces of 19 healthy donors. The inflammatory response was determined by interleukin supernatant quantification using the Cytometric Bead Array kit (B&D). We then conducted a clinical pilot study with 4 patients with UC using immunocompetent cells extracted from rectal biopsies and MAMPs from 3 donor candidates. We employed the test results to guide donor selection for FMT, which was performed by colonoscopy followed by 4 booster instillations by enema in the following month. The microbiome engraftment was assessed by 16S rDNA massive sequencing in feces, and the patients were clinically followed-up for 16 weeks. The results demonstrated that IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1ß were the most variable markers, although we observed a general tolerance to the microbial insults. Clinical and colonoscopy remission of the patients with UC was not achieved after 16 weeks, although FMT provoked enrichment of the Bacteroidota phylum and Prevotella genus, with a decrease in the Actinobacteriota phylum and Agathobacter genus. The most relevant result was the lack of Akkermansia engraftment in UC. In summary, the clinical success of FMT in patients with UC appears not to be influenced by donor selection based on the explored recipient's local immunological response to FMT, suggesting that this approach would not be valid for FMT fecal donor optimization in such patients.

Long-term docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation in cystic fibrosis patients: a randomized, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) patients have an alteration in fatty acid (FA) metabolism, associated with increased omega-6 and low omega-3 FA. Previous studies on supplementation with omega-3 FA in CF had contradictory results, and to date there is no evidence to recommend routine use of omega-3 supplements in CF patients. We hypothesized that long-term supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) will have beneficial effects in these patients, by reducing pulmonary, systemic and intestinal inflammation. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled trial. CF patients (age >2 months) were randomized to receive a seaweed DHA oil solution (50 mg/Kg/day) or matching placebo for 48 weeks. Primary outcomes were pulmonary (interleukin [IL]-8), systemic (IL-8) and intestinal (calprotectin) inflammatory biomarkers. Secondary outcomes included other pulmonary (IL-1ß, IL-6, neutrophil elastase, lactate and calprotectin) and systemic (serum-IL-1ß, IL-6) inflammatory biomarkers, as well as clinical outcomes (FEV1, pulmonary exacerbations, antibiotic use, nutritional status and quality of life). RESULTS: Ninety six CF patients, 44 female, age 14.6±11.9 years (48 DHA and 48 placebo) were included. At trial completion, there were no differences in all primary outcomes [serum-IL-8 (p=0.909), respiratory-IL-8 (p=0.384) or fecal calprotectin (p=0.948)], all secondary inflammatory biomarkers, or in any of the clinical outcomes evaluated. There were few adverse events, with similar incidence in both study groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, long-term DHA supplementation in CF patients was safe, but did not offer any benefit on inflammatory biomarkers, or in clinical outcomes compared with placebo. (NCT01783613).

Antibiotic selection in the treatment of acute invasive infections by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Guidelines by the Spanish Society of Chemotherapy / Elección del tratamiento antibiótico en la infección invasiva aguda por Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Guía de la Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is characterized by a notable intrinsic resistance to antibiotics, mainly mediated by the expression of inducible chromosomic β-lactamases and the production of constitutive or inducible efflux pumps. Apart from this intrinsic resistance, P. aeruginosa possess an extraordinary ability to develop resistance to nearly all available antimicrobials through selection of mutations. The progressive increase in resistance rates in P. aeruginosa has led to the emergence of strains which, based on their degree of resistance to common antibiotics, have been defined as multidrug resistant, extended-resistant and panresistant strains. These strains are increasingly disseminated worldwide, progressively complicating the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections. In this scenario, the objective of the present guidelines was to review and update published evidence for the treatment of patients with acute, invasive and severe infections caused by P. aeruginosa. To this end, mechanisms of intrinsic resistance, factors favoring development of resistance during antibiotic exposure, prevalence of resistance in Spain, classical and recently appeared new antibiotics active against P. aeruginosa, pharmacodynamic principles predicting efficacy, clinical experience with monotherapy and combination therapy, and principles for antibiotic treatment were reviewed to elaborate recommendations by the panel of experts for empirical and directed treatment of P. aeruginosa invasive infections (AU)

Pseudomonas aeruginosa se caracteriza por una notable resistencia intrínseca a los antibióticos mediada fundamentalmente por la expresión de β-lactamasas cromosómicas inducibles y la producción constitutiva o inducible de bombas de expulsión. Además de esta resistencia intrínseca, P. aeruginosa posee una extraordinaria capacidad para desarrollar resistencia a prácticamente todos los antimicrobianos disponibles a través de la selección de mutaciones. El aumento progresivo de la resistencia en P. aeruginosa ha llevado a la aparición de cepas que, de acuerdo con el grado de resistencia frente a los antibióticos habituales, se han definido como multirresistentes, extensamente resistentes y panresistentes. Estas cepas se están diseminando mundialmente, complicando progresivamente el tratamiento de las infecciones por P. aeruginosa. En este escenario, el objetivo de las presentes recomendaciones es la revisión y puesta al día de la evidencia publicada para el tratamiento de pacientes con infección aguda, invasiva y grave por P. aeruginosa. Con este fin, se han revisado los mecanismos de resistencia intrínseca, factores que favorecen el desarrollo de resistencia durante la exposición a antibióticos, prevalencia de la resistencia en España, antibióticos clásicos así como los de reciente introducción activos frente a P. aeruginosa, principios farmacodinámicos predictores de eficacia, experiencia clínica con tratamientos en monoterapia o terapia combinada y principios del tratamiento antibiótico para elaborar por un panel de xpertos recomendaciones para el tratamiento empírico o dirigido de infecciones invasivas por P. aeruginosa (AU)

Counteracting antibiotic resistance: breaking barriers among antibacterial strategies.

INTRODUCTION: To fight against antibiotic resistance, prevention-only is no longer an acceptable strategy. The old concept 'one-infection, one-bug, one-drug', genocentrism in antibiotic discovery, and lack of integration between different antimicrobial strategies have probably contributed to current weaknesses in confronting antibiotic resistance. Resistance should be combatted in all fronts simultaneously, in the patient (complex therapy), the group (where resistance is maintained), and the significant environment (polluted by resistance). AREAS COVERED: This paper is reviewing why specific 'therapeutic' approaches are needed in each of these fronts, using different types of 'drugs' directed to a variety of targets, in the goal of inhibiting antibiotic resistant bacteria. Multi-target integrated combination strategies and therapies should be more extensively evaluated, not only in the infected patient (using novel formats for clinical trials), but as associations of 'therapeutic strategies' in the different compartments where antibiotic resistance emerges and flows (measuring global effects in resistance). EXPERT OPINION: Multi-targeted therapeutic approaches require a relaxation of barriers among the various compounds, including systemic and topic antibiotics, antiseptics, biocides, anti-resistant clones vaccination, phages, decontamination products, and in general eco-evo drugs acting on factors influencing ecology and evolution of resistant bacteria. The application of methods of systems biology will facilitate such a multi-lateral attack to antibiotic resistance. Such advances should be paralleled by a simultaneous progress in regulatory sciences and close coordination among all stakeholders.

Tolerancia y heterorresistencia en microorganismos grampositivos / Tolerance and heteroresistance in Gram-positive microorganisms

En los últimos años se ha constatado la escasa actividad de los tratamientos antibióticos habitualmente recomendados, esencialmente con glucopéptidos, frente a las infecciones producidas por microorganismos grampositivos, sobre todo Staphylococcus aureus con resistencia a la meticilina, a pesar de mostrar valores de concentraciones mínimas inhibitorias (CMI) por debajo del punto de corte de sensibilidad. Los fenómenos de tolerancia (evento genético por el cual una población bacteriana no muere o muere muy lentamente en presencia de un antimicrobiano bactericida), persistencia (estado fenotípico no heredable y transitorio por el que una subpoblación bacteriana [0,1-10%] sobrevive a concentraciones letales de un antimicrobiano con independencia de su mecanismo de acción) y heterorresistencia (fenómeno epigenético por el que se aíslan subpoblaciones isogénicas con menor sensibilidad cuando la población bacteriana se somete a concentraciones por encima del valor de la CMI) han sido en parte señalados como causantes de este hecho. Los nuevos antimicrobianos, entre ellos la daptomicina, se ven menos afectados por este tipo de fenómenos y deben considerarse de elección cuando se demuestre o sospeche su presencia (AU)

During the last few years, insufficient efficacy of currently recommended antimicrobial agents has been observed, mainly in the case of glycopeptides, during the treatment of infections due to methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus, even if these isolates show MIC values within the susceptible range. The phenomena associated with this observation are tolerance (a genetic event in which a bactericidal antibiotic fails to kill a bacterial population), persistence (a non-inherited and transient phenotypic phenomenon in which a bacterial subpopulation –0.1%-10%– survive lethal antimicrobial concentrations irrespective of the mechanisms of action) and heteroresistance (an epigenetic event in which less susceptible isogenic subpopulations are recovered when the entire population is challenged with concentrations exceeding MIC values). New antimicrobials, including daptomycin, are less affected by these phenomena and should be considered as the treatment of choice when these events are demonstrated or suspected (AU)

[Diagnosis and treatment of bronchiectasis. Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery]. / Diagnóstico y tratamiento de las bronquiectasias. SEPAR.

Bronchiectasis is the end result of several different diseases that share principles of management. The clinical course usually involves chronic bronchial infection and inflammation, which are associated with progression. The cause of bronchiectasis should always be investigated, particularly when it can be treated. We recommend evaluating etiology, symptoms, bronchial colonization and infection, respiratory function, inflammation, structural damage, nutritional status, and quality of life in order to assess severity and to monitor clinical course. Care should be supervised by specialized units, at least in cases of chronic bronchial infection, recurrent exacerbations, or when there is a cause that is likely to respond to treatment. Improving symptoms and halting progression are the goals of management, which is based on treatment of the underlying cause and of acute or chronic infections and on the drainage of secretions. Complications that arise must also be treated. Antibiotic prescription is guided by how well infection is being controlled, and this is indicated by the color of sputum and a reduction in the number of exacerbations. We recommend inhaled antibiotics in cases of chronic bronchial infection that does not respond to oral antibiotics, when these cause side effects, or when the cause is Pseudomonas species or other bacteria resistant to oral antibiotics. Inhaled administration is also advisable to treat initial colonization by Pseudomonas species.

Respiratory tract infections: at-risk patients, who are they? Implications for their management with levofloxacin.

Two of the most serious respiratory tract infections are community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). The most common pathogens found in patients with these infections are Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is also relatively common, particularly in elderly patients with AECB. S. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa are also of concern in relation to the development of resistance to antimicrobial drugs. The administration of antibiotics at doses that result in concentrations exceeding the mutant prevention concentration at the site of infection is one strategy to prevent the development of drug-resistant pathogens. AECB is associated with a high risk of in-hospital mortality, particularly in patients treated in the intensive care unit. CAP is also associated with significant risks and often requires treatment under hospital supervision. Several patient-related factors help identify those patients who are most at risk of mortality and morbidity. Treatment should be tailored towards the severity of the disease. The fluoroquinolones, such as levofloxacin, are an effective treatment option for AECB and CAP. Compared with many other antibiotics, resistance to levofloxacin remains low for most infecting pathogens. The oral bioavailability of levofloxacin is over 99%, enabling simple switching from intravenous to oral therapy during treatment. It is also preferentially distributed to compartments in the lung, thus achieving high concentrations at the site of respiratory tract infections. Combined with cover of the major infecting pathogens found in patients with AECB and CAP, and a cost-effective treatment compared with many alternative therapies, levofloxacin is an attractive option for the treatment of at-risk patients with these respiratory tract infections.